Orbiting Tomorrow

Explore the dissolving boundary between science and science fiction with news from the front lines of discovery and imaginative speculation on how each one could change our world.

Rent on Mars: Cost of Living on the Red Planet

Popular Science recently published a cool infographic on the cost of colonizing Mars. All you aspiring space travelers had better start saving up:

  • Putting one pound of material into space would cost between $3,000 – $900,000, depending on the agency.
  • Transporting a year’s supply of food and water for a single person would cost between $13 million – $42 million. Planning to terraform, or establish a self-sustaining agricultural system? Transporting sufficient materials for this would cost between $12 billion – $20 billion.
  • It would take the equivalent of 400 houseplants to generate enough oxygen to sustain a single person.
  • Don’t plan on any long-distance relationships: a one-minute phone call from Mars to Earth would cost over $200. Oddly, text messaging rates would be 20% cheaper!

Making a home on Mars isn’t impossible, but it won’t be cheap.

Wow, and I thought cost of living in my East Coast city was expensive! Prices on Mars would be, well…astronomical. With the state of worldwide economies today, most countries don’t have extra billions lying around to fund interplanetary missions. An alliance of nations could contribute—a sort of extension of the international space station. It seems more likely that a wealthy individual or corporation would sponsor the effort. (Suddenly I’m picturing rockets plastered with advertising; the red planet, brought to you by Red Bull).

That could lead to an interesting choice of settlers. A government project would involve a star-studded casts of scientists, astronauts, and other qualified experts. Private money changes those criteria. Theoretically, anyone with a deep enough wallet could buy a summer home on a Martian polar cap. A corporation might sponsor a celebrity to make the trip as an extended publicity stunt.

Absurd but not unthinkable, a television station might decide that the confined life on a Martian colony is the ultimate reality hit; “The Real World: Mars”. Or, save us, “Jersey Shore” (or “Mare Erythraeum Shore”, although I doubt Snooki could pronounce the Latin-based names of Martian geography). Hopefully the high price of transmitting video would dissuade such an idea!

Let’s assume an expedition is financed and the intrepid travelers set up house on Mars. What would happen if the funding dried up? Would the settlers be stranded until donations enabled a rescue mission? Or would they be left to their own salvation—frantically trying to rebuild a space shuttle or terraform a sustainable source of food—as their supplies and their hope dwindled? Perhaps it will take an event of that magnitude to make humans realize that some things, like clean water and oxygen, are worth more than all the money in the universe.


One comment on “Rent on Mars: Cost of Living on the Red Planet

  1. Pingback: Earth v2.0: Finding Habitable Planets Near White Dwarf Stars | Orbiting Tomorrow

Join the Thought Experiment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s


This entry was posted on January 31, 2013 by in Space and tagged , , , , .
%d bloggers like this: